By Annemarie Franczyk | Buffalo Business First | Jul 9, 2021, 6:00am EDT
What industry leaders say about opportunities, challenges in the field of energy
Buffalo Business First’s Roundtable: Energy. (JOED VIERA)
Climate leaders long have been developing systems that draw clean and sustainable energy from the sun, wind, and waterways. A 2019 New York State law, intending to address climate change and reach net-zero emissions, is accelerating those efforts with rigorous targets, beginning in 2025.
The initiatives that will emerge from the law will sweep across individuals, business, and industry as anyone who builds, rehabs, or owns a building will have to accept new practices and energy sources to turn on the lights and set the thermostat.
The region’s leaders gathered to discuss the opportunities and challenges posed by New York’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act and other issues affecting their industries during a recent Panel of Experts event hosted by Business First of Buffalo.
Panelists were:
Michael Barbasch, energy and commissioning discipline leader, LaBella Associates DPC.
James Dentinger, president, Noco Enterprises Co. LLC
David Flynn, partner, energy, environment and nanotechnology practice teams leader, Phillips Lytle LLP
Gary Marchiori, president, EnergyMark LLC
Daniel Montante, president, Montante Solar
Melanie Stachowiak, partner, M/E Engineering P.C.
The depth and breadth of the Climate Act took everyone by surprise when it became law two years ago, Flynn said.
“Everybody sat back and said, ‘What is this and how in God’s name do we implement it because it literally touches every aspect of human life in New York State,” Flynn said. “So how do you wrap your head and hands around that and pull it together?”
“We’re seeing these evaluations in 50% to 60% energy reduction for these buildings.” — Melanie Stachowiak, partner, M/E Engineering P.C. (JOED VIERA)
The answer might be in the scoping plan that is being written by the New York Climate Action Council. It will lay out and prioritize at a high level the different pieces of the act that are going to be implemented over the coming generations, Flynn said. Some of those are significant in terms of electrifying buildings and getting fossil fuel-driven vehicles off the road, he said. The scoping plan is expected to be completed later this year.
The council is a 22-member committee representing utilities, academia, advocacy groups, energy providers, environmental groups, and New York state government. Business does not have a seat at the table, Flynn noted.
“It’s important for the business community to make sure their voices are heard in this process,” Flynn said. “Nobody is really standing back and saying these are great ideas but what are they going to cost and how do we pay for them. There will be horrific sticker shock as these things start to roll out.”
Some building modernization and efficiency requirements are “almost incomprehensible,” Flynn said, in terms of how impactful and costly they are going to be to the costs of construction.
“Let’s remember this is not a national act, this is New York State,” Flynn said. “So, if you don’t want to pay an extra 50 bucks a foot for a building for high energy efficiency you can go to 49 other states and not have to deal with all that. So, it’s important for the business community to be heard in the process.”
“It has the potential to transform the economy and allow New York to be a leader in that space.” — David Flynn, partner, energy, environment and nanotechnology practice teams leader, Phillips Lytle LLP (JOED VIERA)
The state has “moonshot aspirations” with what is expected to be achieve by 2050, Montante said. He predicts a practical and financial struggle meeting the goals of the law. For example, solar projects cannot be built in 40% of the territory served by Rochester Electric & Gas and New York State Electric & Gas because the transmission lines cannot handle the additional voltage, he said. That blocks an enormous portion of the state’s geography from any solar initiative. Fixing the situation requires plowing hundreds of millions of dollars to upgrade the transmission system just in that region.
“You just can’t build a solar project, plug it into the transmission lines and you’re good to go,” Montante said. “There is an enormous amount of existing infrastructure issues that need to be overcome and the price tag to do that is not entirely clear yet. It’s safe to say you’re in the billions and billions of dollars to achieve that.”
Add other related elements, such as energy storage systems that will consistently and evenly emit power, and the price increases, Stachowiak said.
Businesses should be cognizant that their efforts toward reducing energy use could be attractive to future workforces, Dentinger said. The young person coming into the workforce now has grown up with environmental consciousness and expects to work for a company that is focused on sustainability and energy use, he said.
Western New York employers could experience this particularly as it recruits young workers to its growing technology hub.
“Those are the workers really attracted to places that have a strong focus on the environment as a core principle,” Dentinger said. “So, it’s important that my generation understands that dynamic. That generation has grown up very quickly and their expectation is different than was ours was 20 or 30 years ago. It’s important that Buffalo is a leader in this. If the Climate Act is done properly, it could be strategic to Western New York.”
“Why not embrace something that is good for the world and good for the economy?” — Jim Dentinger, president, Noco Enterprises Co. LLC (JOED VIERA)
Solar energy, once a focus of energy alternatives, has become vilified lately. There are reasons for what drives such perception from the public, Montante said. Existing projects have unattractive views from the street in general and for those mega-large, 25-megawatt and up projects, in rural communities in particular, the concept of home rule and home permitting has gone away.
“That whole authority has been stripped from local municipalities and now resides in Albany, and there’s a lot of push back. There’s a lot of resentment directed at Albany but it’s hitting the entire industry,” he said.
There also are many falsehoods about solar projects that are contributing to the general beliefs, including that they are noisy and will leave a brownfield in their wake, he said.
“What needs to be focused on are some of the great rationales to embrace solar,” Montante said. “Number one, from a municipality’s perspective, this provides a great tax base. A project developed on a 20-acre site will bring in property taxes and not demand any services from the community.”
He said residential rooftop solar is “very healthy” and predicts robust markets in low- and moderate-income housing and solar projects sited on former industrial or brownfield sites. The positive forecast is supported by grid parity, the cost of generating solar electricity is equal or less than that of traditional grid electricity, having been reached in several areas of the state.
Another positive: such projects provide high-paying construction jobs, and area residents will be able to buy lower-cost power that they can get from the grid, Montante added.
“If you break down the economics, these projects make clear sense,” Montante said. “It all comes down to poor project planning in the past that has put a black eye on the industry.”
“It all comes down to poor project planning in the past that has put a black eye on the industry.” — Daniel Montante, president, Montante Solar (JOED VIERA)
Increasing solar power, however, is the Climate Act’s first goal. The state wants to achieve 6,000 megawatts of solar power by 2025. There are less than 500 completed megawatts now, making the state’s target aggressive, Marchiori said.
Meeting that target could be especially challenging, given the community opposition to current projects, Marchiori said. In addition to the home rule issue, there are 22 agency-approval levels to siting a solar field. The 25-acre community solar projects preferably are located on brownfields, which can be controversial. Getting approvals can be difficult, but Marchiori predicts that ultimately there will be hundreds of those across the state. Siting the 1,000-acre utility-scale solar projects will be difficult for many of the same reasons.
Marchiori said that the total square miles needed to reach the state’s goals equals half the landmass of Erie County.
“Their contribution to the grid is part of this move to renewables but the barriers are the agencies’ ability to handle the scale of this right now given the requirements of permitting, studies, and so on,” Marchiori said. “Subsidies are less now. As solar has developed, the subsidies have decreased somewhat so the economics of that are also less attractive today than they were two years ago.”
Perhaps not surprisingly, hydro-power, which is 23% of the state’s electric generation source, is in Western New York, he said. Downstate uses natural gas and oil, making Western New York considerably greener.
“Subsidies are less now. As solar has developed, the subsidies have decreased somewhat so the economics of that are also less attractive today than they were two years ago.” — Gary Marchiori, president, EnergyMark LLC (JOED VIERA)
Customers have not focused on how energy is produced, they just want it to be produced and they want it to be cost effective as they transition from traditional fossil fuel, Dentinger said.
One of the biggest challenges is cutting through the myriad of information sent to homes by competing marketers so that the consumer ultimately truly understands and accepts the benefits for both them and the environment.
“Why not embrace something that is good for the world and good for the economy?” Dentinger said. “It really starts with a grassroots approach. You can save some money and find more cost-effective ways to bring energy into your home.”
Engineering firms, meanwhile, are attempting to address the Climate Act’s aggressive goals in a number of ways, Stachowiak said.
Their work involves diving into the energy use of a building and looking at energy conservation measures and preliminary feasibility studies and analyses, Stachowiak said. Measures are evaluated from costs, maintenance, and the life cycle of the equipment and then the measures are stacked to see how they are working together and whether the building’s energy use can be minimized, she said.
Different technologies, such as geothermal and solar power systems, are then evaluated.
“We’re seeing these evaluations in 50% to 60% energy reduction for these buildings,” Stachowiak said. “When you do 100% renewables, now you’re talking about a net-zero building.”
It takes a motivated building owner or developer to engage these systems and technologies, however, Barbasch said.
“It’s a good opportunity for existing building owners to contemplate the renovation to make sure they’re embarking on the right decision, not just based on first costs but on the lifecycle cost of the system” — Michael Barbasch, energy and commissioning discipline leader, LaBella Associates, DPC. (JOED VIERA)
Typically, when a developer wants a building here to do that, the engineering firm and architect hired are obligated to meet the building and energy codes required by the state. It doesn’t require them to review with the owner form and cost of alternatives, he said.
“There is that one extra step,” Barbasch said. “The motivated building owner or developer would have to really seek out that analysis. The funding programs through the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority would in some cases pay for all of that or most of those efforts, whether it’s a new construction, a gut-rehab or even an existing building where they are contemplating a renovation. The state has been good at funding those programs.”
Barbasch mentioned NYSERDA’s Flexible Technical Assistance Program that offers up to 100% of the costs of an energy study of a building that will help identify and evaluate opportunities to reduce energy costs and incorporate clean energy into capital planning.
“It’s a good opportunity for existing building owners to contemplate the renovation to make sure they’re embarking on the right decision, not just based on first costs but on the lifecycle cost of the system,” Barbasch said. “You have to get out of the mindset of not the best boiler out there but the best system to heat or cool the building.”
Stachowiak said developers and building owners have become more receptive to the alternative energy systems, but in the end, it comes down to cost.
“You don’t find many business owners who what to be proactive,” Dentinger said. “We have to be in front of that discussion.”
Flynn predicted that aggressive energy saving and waste reduction initiatives by the state will increase the cost of doing business and create disincentives to rehab buildings and expand economically in New York.
At the same time, the initiatives will create business and job opportunities, such as in energy storage, that haven’t been available in the region until recently, he said. In a positive development, after the results of the national elections in November, inquiries came into Phillips Lytle from investors from outside the state, Europe and the Far East who are interested in pursuing renewable energy projects in New York because of the receptive and supportive market, Flynn said.
“That’s the glass half-full view,” Flynn said. “It has the potential to transform the economy and allow New York to be a leader in that space. The transition, I’m concerned, is going to take a long time and could be painful if it isn’t managed appropriately.”